Chapter 6

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF VICTIMS



Published in Monograph No 55, May 2001
The Role of Firearms in Crime in South Africa
A Detailed Analysis of Police Dockets
Ettienne Hennop, Jakkie Potgieter and Clare Jefferson



Everyone is vulnerable to crime, but certain people appear to be more at risk than others. The docket analysis provides some indication of the profile of people who are relatively more vulnerable to firearm-related crime. The profile of victims in terms of crime types is useful for the development of safety and crime prevention strategies. The following section provides an overview of the victims involved in the various crimes. It considers the main demographic information on victims: gender, race, age, vocation and employment. Victim information is usually more comprehensive than information available in dockets on offenders. This relates to the fact that the victim usually lays the complaint, consequently providing more substantial information. The offender, on the other hand, is often unknown and, hence, only partial information can be obtained.

Gender

There were more male than female victims. Comparatively speaking, the proportion of female victims was greater in those crimes with which violence against women is usually associated. These included 42.1% of assault victims, 27.6% of victims in incidences where a firearm was discharged in a built-up place and 25% of victims of the crime of possession or using a firearm while under the influence of alcohol.

Race

What is interesting is that particular race groups suffer a disproportionately greater level of victimisation in certain crimes than others. For example, an extremely high number of murders (90.3%) and attempted murders (76.5%) occur among the coloured sample. This could be as a result of the gang violence in the Mitchell’s Plain area.

Age

The age of victims varied across firearm-related incidents. In property crimes (armed robbery, common robbery and hijacking), ages were marginally higher than in the case of murders and attempted murders. This is attributed both to the high level of property ownership and the value of property among victims over the age of 30 years.

Table 26: Gender profile of victims (percentage)
Gender Armed robbery Common robbery Hi- jacking Murder Attempted murder Theft of firearm Point-ing a firearm Dis- charging a firearm in built-up place Pos-session of illegal firearm Assault Negligent loss of firearm Pos-session /use of firearm under influence of alcohol
Male 77.3 92.1 89.9 87.5 78.4 76.7 82.8 72.4 100 57.9 100 75
Female 22.7 7.9 10.1 12.5 21.6 23.3 17.2 27.6 0 42.1 0 25
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Victims (n) 264 101 89 72 102 60 99 29 5 19 13 4



Table 27: Race profile of victims (percentage)
Race Armed robbery Com-mon rob-bery Hi-jacking Murder Attempt-ed murder Theft of firearm Point-ing a firearm Dis-charging a firearm in built-up place Pos-session of illegal firearm Assault Neg-ligent loss of firearm Pos-session/ use of firearm under influence of alcohol
African 36.5 47.5 44.3 5.6 13.7 24.6 27.6 14.8 20 42.1 0 0
Asian 28.9 9.9 14.8 1.4 5.9 7 17.3 14.8 0 5.3 0 0
Coloured 18.3 13.9 30.7 90.3 76.5 14 37.8 55.6 20 47.4 0 100
White 16.3 28.7 10.2 2.8 3.9 54.4 17.3 14.8 60 5.3 100 0
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Victims (n) 263 101 88 72 102 57 98 27 5 19 13 4


Table 28: Age profile of victims (percentage)
Age Armed robbery Com-mon robbery Hi-jacking Murder Attempted murder Theft of firearm Point-ing a firearm Dis-charging a firearm in built-up place Pos-session of illegal firearm Assault Negligent loss of firearm Pos-session /use of firearm under influence of alcohol
>16 years 0.8 2.1 1.2 3 4.5 1.8 2.1 3.7 0 11.8 0 0
16-20 years 5 5.3 8.5 21.2 22.5 7.3 14.4 3.7 25 17.6 0 0
21-30 years 37.8 38.3 42.7 43.9 29.2 25.5 47.4 55.6 25 41.2 0 50
31-40 years 28.6 25.5 22 18.2 28.1 40 24.7 18.5 0 23.5 53.8 25
41-50 years 18.5 13.8 13.4 9.1 14.6 16.4 7.2 14.8 0 5.9 0 25
51-60 years 9.3 6.4 11.2 4.5 1.1 9.1 4.1 3.7 50 0 46.2 0
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Victims (n) 238 94 82 66 89 55 57 27 4 17 13 4

Vocational profile

The vocation of victims provides insight about activities that take up most of their time. Clearly, this would affect the type of crime that the victim is most at risk of experiencing. For example, a housewife has a lesser geographic mobility than a person employed in the formal sector. Yet, a housewife may be more fixed and predictable in terms of movement patterns, which make her a softer target for certain types of crimes. It was found that housewives comprised 19.2% of the victims or complainants in incidents involving the discharge of a firearm in a built-up place and 10.2% of attempted murder victims.

Employment status

As informed by the vocation of the victim, the following table provides a summary of the difference in employment status of victims. The vast majority of victims were employed, with the exception of victims of murder and attempted murder.

Table 29: Vocational profile of victims (percentage)
Vocation Armed robbery Com-mon robbery Hi-jacking Murder Attempt-ed murder Theft of firearm Point-ing a firearm Dis-charging a firearm in built-up place Pos-session of illegal firearm As-sault Negligent loss of firearm Pos-session /use of firearm under influence of alcohol
Child/baby 0.4 3.2 0 1.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Attending
school 0.4 0 4.9 5.3 12.5 1.7 4.2 3.8 0 20 0 0
School-going age, not attending 0 0 0 1.8 1.1 0 0 0 0 13.3 0 0
Full-time scholar, student 0.9 2.2 3.7 5.3 2.3 3.4 7.3 0 0 0 0 0
Housewife 1.3 1.1 0 3.5 10.2 1.7 5.2 19.2 0 0 0 0
Domestic
worker 0.9 1.1 0 0 0 3.4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Retired/ pensioner 1.3 4.3 0 1.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unemployed 3 5.4 6.1 36.8 31.8 0 10.4 15.4 0 20 0 50
Employed, formal sector 67.8 57 59.8 29.8 28.4 61 47.9 53.8 80 33.3 53.8 50
Employed informal sector 1.7 6.5 1.2 1.8 0 1.7 1 0 0 0 46.2 0
Self-employed 21 14 23.2 10.5 10.2 22 22.9 7.7 20 13.3 0 0
Other 1.3 5.4 1.2 1.8 3.4 5.1 1 0 0 0 0 0
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Victims (n) 233 93 82 57 88 59 49 26 5 15 13 4

Occupation

When considering the type of profession of victims, it is interesting to note the range of different occupations victims were engaged in at the time of the incident. In terms of armed robbery, a large proportion of victims of theft were victimised while involved in their occupations, especially those involving the immediate exchange of goods for cash (such as 37.5% of shop assistants or cashiers). It is also interesting to note the high level of risk that private security guards are exposed to: they are involved in 10.6% of armed robberies; 20.3% of common robberies; and 16.3% of incidences involving the pointing of a firearm. Taxi drivers were also significantly victimised, being involved in 6.8% of armed robberies and 22.4% of hijackings.

Table 30: Employment status of victims (percentage)
Status Armed robbery Com-mon robbery Hi-jacking Murder Attempt-ed murder Theft of firearm Pointing a firearm Dis-charging a firearm in built-up place Pos-session of illegal firearm Assault Neg-ligent loss of firearm Pos-session /use of firearm under influence of alcohol
Not looking for employment (such asscholars, students, retired) 4.3 10.8 8.5 19.3 26.1 6.8 16.7 23.1 0 33.3 0 0
Unemployed 3 5.4 6.1 36.8 31.8 3.4 10.4 15.4 0 20 0 50
Employed 91.4 78.5 84.1 42.1 38.6 84.7 71.9 61.5 100 46.7 100 50
Other 3 5.4 1.2 1.8 3.4 5.1 1 0 0 0 0 0
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Victims (n) 233 93 82 57 88 59 96 26 5 15 13 4


Table 31: Occupational profile of victims (percentage)
Occupation Armed robbery Com-mon robbery Hi-jacking Murder Attempt-ed murder Theft of firearm Point-ing a firearm Dis-charging a firearm in built-up place Pos-session of illegal firearm Assault Neg-ligent loss of firearm Pos-session/ use of firearm under influence of alcohol
Academic, researcher, teacher 0 0 1.7 8.3 4 2.2 0 0 0 12.5 0 33.3
Accountant 1.9 1.7 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Advocate, prosecutor 0 0 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0
Architect 0 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bank teller 1.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bar/club owner 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Builder, contractor, foreman 2.5 5.1 0 0 4 8.9 0 0 0 12.5 0 0
bus driver, conductor 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.1 0 0 0 0 0
Business person 1.3 0 1.7 8.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chef 0.6 1.7 0 0 0 2.2 0 8.3 0 12.5 0 0
Civil servant 1.3 0 0 0 0 2.2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cleaner, domestic worker 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Clerk 6.3 3.4 1.7 0 8 6.7 0 16.7 0 0 0 0
Debit collector 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Farm manager 0.6 0 0 0 0 6.7 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hairdresser, beautician 0 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hawker, vendor 0 0 0 8.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Imports /exports 1.3 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Labourer 0 0 0 16.7 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Manager, assistant, supervisor 0 5.1 6.9 0 4 2.2 4.1 0 25 0 0 33.3
Medical profession 2.5 0 0 0 0 2.2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Messenger, office driver 10.0 3.4 17.2 0 4.0 2.2 6.1 0 0 012.5 0 0
Peace officer 0 0 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Petrol attendant station owner 0 0 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Prison warder 0 0 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Private security guard 10.6 20.3 0 0 20.0 2.2 16.3 16.7 0 12.5 40.0 0
Religious person 0 0 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reporter 0 0 0 0 0 2.2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sailor 0 0 0 0 4.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sales rep – mobile 5.3 13.6 6.9 16.7 8.0 4.4 4.1 0 0 0 0 0
SANDF 0.6 11.9 1.7 8.3 4.0 4.4 4.1 16.7 0 0 30.0 0
SAPS 3.1 6.8 12.1 0 4.0 15.6 10.2 25.0 78.0 12.5 0 0
Secretary 0 3.4 0 8.3 0 6.7 2.0 0 0 0 0 0
Sex worker 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5 0 0
Shop assistant, cashier 37.5 8.5 12.1 0 8.0 6.7 10.2 0 0 12.5 0 0
Smuggler, drug dealer 0 0 0 8.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Snake park owner 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.3 0 0 0 0
Taxi driver/ owner 6.9 1.7 22.4 8.3 16.0 8.9 18.4 0 0 0 0 0
Technician, mechanic 3.1 3.4 5.2 0 4.0 4.4 4.1 0 0 0 0 33.3
Trade, craft person 0 5.1 0 8.3 0 6.7 2.0 8.3 0 0 0 0
Travel agent 0 0 0 0 0 2.2 6.1 0 0 0 0 0
Truck driver 0.6 0 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Waiter /waitress 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Victims (n) 160 59 58 12 25 45 49 12 4 8 10 3