Case study 1: CC and two othersA Mercedes vehicle was stolen from the owner using an AK 47 rifle and a pistol. Another vehicle was used to trail the Mercedes and block it from behind when the driver stopped to drop off a friend. After the robbery, the Mercedes was used in an unsuccessful attempt to rob another motorist of a Toyota Prado, using the same method. Two weeks later the vehicle was stopped at the Chirundu border post en route to Zambia to be sold. The car had by then been fitted with South African registration plates. Four people were involved but one could not be found. The case against the other three was pending at the time of writing. |
Case study 2: D and three othersThis involved the impersonation of the police by individuals who flagged down the driver of a loaded delivery van. They then forced him out of the van and pretended to be taking him to a police station. One of the suspects drove the van and some distance later it was diverted to a deserted spot, where the driver was dumped, after being warned of dire consequences if he reported the matter to the police. A knife was brandished. A gang of four, including one female, was later apprehended and they were awaiting trial at the time of writing. The van was recovered. |


Case study 3: The United Merchant Bank and Boka Group of Companies cases The United Merchant Bank was incorporated in May 1995. In less than three years the bank's licence was revoked after it became known that it had a low capital ratio and inadequate liquidity to meet the claims of depositors and other liabilities. Police investigations subsequently revealed that many illegal activities had been committed .
|
Case study 4: JK and three others
|
Case study 5A syndicate of seven, made up of three Zimbabweans, two Pakistanis, a Kenyan and a Somali national, used spare lines recovered from defaulting clients to set up informal telephone exchanges, through which telephone calls were routed . |
Case study 6A syndicate comprising at least ten Indian nationals is alleged to have operated call centres using PTC lines. They connived with a technician and a clerk of the PTC to suppress the recording of units when calls were made, thus diminishing the revenue accruing to the PTC. |
Some of the signatures on the medical reports were illegible and appeared to have been forged. In fact, the Commission heard evidence from Mr Blackmore the handwriting expert (which confirmed the Commission's own suspicions) that in a number of cases one of the doctors, Dr C Hunzvi, had deliberately tried to disguise his handwriting to give the impression that another doctor had signed the forms. The doctor realised that his signature would raise suspicion as to the authenticity of not only the injuries on which the claims were based but also the medical examination purported to have been undertaken. The claimants were close relatives of his, i.e. his uncle Hopio and his cousin Jonathan. There was also strong evidence that Dr Hunzvi himself had signed his own application form again using a forged signature. The inevitable conclusion was that he had examined himself (if at all), and was sufficiently cognisant of the impropriety of his actions to try and disguise his signature.14
Case study 7: A development ministry developing croniesThe Ministry of Rural Resources and Water Development has been at the centre of several questionable transactions in the last decade.The Auditor General (AG) found that the ministry awarded tenders for certain public works to an individual contractor without considering whether the contractor possessed the requisite capital resources and technical expertise for timeous completion of the projects. Some of the projects were for rural dam construction. In 1998, this resulted in the ministry incurring escalation costs amounting to Z$57.7 million.The ministry also guaranteed a loan of Z$1.5 million by a favoured contractor from a government-aligned commercial bank without Treasury authority.It also paid unsecured advances to the tune of Z$7.2 million to the contractor of the three rural dams. The AG also found that the ministry had purchased "drought mitigation equipment" worth US $27.2 million (Z$751 million) for the District Development Fund (DDF). Equipment valued at US$25.1 million (Z$691.7 million) was missing from the government assets register, prompting the AG to report that he was "unable to determine whether all this equipment was properly accounted for".There were "ghost workers" in the ministry who benefiting from subsistence and travel allowances. The AG pointed out that the ministry had issued allowances to these unknown employees on 50 occasions in a period of 18 months. No investigation was done to identify the unknown employees. |
Case study 8: Land indigenisation salesfronts and criminals in land scandalA 'land for the boys' scheme, which was administered by a veteran former African nationalist in 2000, came to grief when funds deposited to secure land allocations disappeared. The former politician, Michael Mawema, ran the scheme along with one Ben Chisvo and an architect. They received deposits, ostensibly to get farms for aspiring back commercial farmers. According to Mawema, the scheme was known to, and supported by, government ministers. No receipts were issued on payment of the deposits and none of the prospective farmers was shown a map of the farms, presumably since they had not yet been surveyed and subdivided.Almost Z$7 million was paid into the scheme to buy cheap land from the government under the 'fast-track' land resettlement programme. Sums paid ranged from Z$40,000 to Z$100,000 per depositor, depending on the hectarage required. The money was supposed to be deposited into a dedicated bank account but was allegedly diverted to Chisvo's building society account. Much of it was embezzled. At a meeting in September 2000, it was revealed that the account's balance was just over Z$100,000. It was further revealed that Mawema was on a national land acquisition committee chaired by Vice-President Joseph Msika. Mawema alleged that he had been assured by Minister Ignatius Chombo that farmers would be allocated land. The technical problem was the shortage of valuators to ascertain payments to dispossessed farm owners.Shortly after the meeting, Mawema committed suicide. He disclosed in a suicide note that he had received commission for his part in the scheme, but claimed that he had also been betrayed. |
Case study 9: The Harare airport extension tenderThe tender to construct a new international air terminal at Harare airport became one of the most controversial issues of the 1990s. Estimated to cost Z$5 billion, the tender attracted interests from various construction entities. On the basis of the prescribed criteria, the Government Tender Board awarded the tender to a consortium led by a French company, Airport de Paris. The decision did not go down well with influential members in central government, including President Mugabe and two of his senior ministers. Intense maneuvers to overturn the award followed, which included arm-twisting parliament to accede to a Cabinet decision to award the project to a little known company called Air Harbour Technologies (AHT), owned and run by one Hani Yamani, a Saudi national.Connections between AHT and Zimbabwe 's leadership came to light as a result of disagreements between Yamani and some of the key functionaries involved in the airport project. AHT's successful tender was brokered by President Mugabe's nephew, Leo Mugabe, acting together with Zidco Holdings, the commercial arm of the ruling ZANU(PF) party. Simultaneously with the construction of the terminal, AHT funded the construction of a private residence for the President by a Yugoslav company. Yamani donated US $50,000 to ZANU(PF) and made payments to two senior cabinet ministers. It was undisputed that Energoprojekt, a Yugoslav company with offices in Zimbabwe , was constructing a plush residence for Mugabe in the up-market northern suburb of Borrowdale in Harare . By the time of its completion in April 2001, the airport terminal had cost more than Z$7 billion.In July 1999, Yamani complained to President Mugabe about excessive kickbacks. His letter was leaked to an independent newspaper, which published it in December 2000.17 Following publication, the newspaper's printing works were destroyed by a massive explosive. No arrests have occurred, amid widespread speculation that state agents were involved in the bombing. |
The manager of a Harare based trading company offered a typical story of an enterprise working with the military. From January 1999 his company exported chemicals for processing mineral ores to Lubumbashi . Having learnt through counterparts of opportunities in the minerals sector, his company diversified into purchasing diamonds from the DRC and then became interested in gold. The company transported diamonds by air to Zimbabwe through Lubumbashi airport, which was guarded by the ZDF, and used military personnel as a cover to avoid Congolese customs. The company worked with one particular officer who received a commission of 5% of the diamonds' value for his service.18
Case study 10: The Agip case"In the late 1970s and early 1980s, AGIP (Africa) Limited , a company incorporated in Jersey, was engaged in drilling for oil in Tunisia, on its own behalf and in joint ventures with other companies under permits and concessions granted by the Tunisian Government. The Tunis branch held a US dollar account at Banque du Sud from which overseas suppliers were paid. Over a period of many years (from 1976), both before and after 1983 when accountants Jackson & Co. became involved in the matter, AGIP was systematically defrauded of millions of dollars by its chief accountant, a Mr Zdiri. Though not a director of the company or a signatory of any bank account, he was responsible for collecting invoices and matching them to the completed payment orders prior to obtaining approved signatures for the same. He was also responsible for banking. Mr Zdiri used his position to misappropriate the funds by altering the name of the payee on the payment orders after obtaining authorised signatures.The court heard that between March 1983 and January 1985, Mr Zdiri defrauded AGIP of US$10.5 million by altering some 27 orders that found their way to England . The payees were all companies registered in England and managed by Jackson & Co., based in the Isle of Man. Seven different companies, each holding a US$ account at a major branch of Lloyds Bank (a major British bank) were used in succession to receive the monies. However, AGIP did not bring a criminal case for fraud or even a case for the recovery of US$10.5 million or anything (said to be in excess of $17 million) dating back from 1976. Instead it took civil action under 'law of trust' to recover only the sum of US $518,822.92 (being the last of the diverted monies), paid on 7th January 1985 to Baker Oil Services, on the ground that this was all that Jackson & Co. could reasonably afford to repay.The case was defended by Mr Barry Jackson and a Mr Edward Bowers , who practiced as chartered accountants in Douglas , Isle of Man , under the name of Jackson & Co. The third defendant, a Mr Ian Griffin, was an employee of the firm. Jackson & Co., it transpired, were acting on the instructions of a French lawyer, Monsieur Yves Coulon, who in turn was acting for principals whose identity was not known. The court noted that Jackson & Co. was introduced to the prevailing arrangements by Roger Humphrey of Thornton Baker (now Grant Thornton) who also provided the payee companies. Each of the companies had a nominal share capital, which was usually registered in the names of service companies provided by Jackson & Co. In each case, Mr Jackson and Mr Griffin were the directors and the authorised signatories on the company's bank account. None of the companies had any assets or carried on any genuine business activity. In the case of each company, except that of Baker Oil, after two or three payments had been received and paid out, the account was closed and a new account opened for the successor company. Its predecessor was then put into liquidation and either Mr Jackson or Mr Bowers were appointed liquidator. All bank statements of the payee companies' showed the receipts to be derived from payments made by AGIP.When the payee company received a payment, it was immediately transferred, usually on the same day, to another company, Euro-Arabian Jewellery Limited , which also maintained a US dollar account at the same branch of Lloyds bank. Euro-Arabian was registered in England with Mr Jackson as one of its three directors. Jackson, Humphrey and Griffin were the authorised signatories of its bank account, with the agreement that either could act as a signatory in his own right. There was no evidence to show that Euro-Arabian carried on any genuine business activity. As soon as it received any payment from a payee company, it paid it out to parties located abroad. Most of the money went to Kinz Joaillier SARL, incorporated in France, which appeared to be a subsidiary of Euro-Arabian Jewellery. Mr Jackson was a director of the company with Yves Coulon acting as its legal adviser. Coulon had no authority to operate the bank accounts of any of the payee companies or Euro- Arabian, but the bank's assistant manager, a Mr Breeze, was authorised to disclose information about the accounts to him. Indeed, Coulon visited the bank during his travels to London and lunched with Breeze who believed Coulon to be the man behind all the arrangements. Breeze was told to expect payments of about US $500,000 per month from Tunis. When a payment was expected , he would be notified by Jackson & Co. Upon receipt of money, he would telephone Jackson & Co and inform them that the sums had been received. After a short interval, but usually on the same day (presumably after instructions from someone e.g. Coulon), upon Mr Jackson's instructions, the monies would be paid out.The case brought by AGIP centred on a payment to Baker Oil. Baker Oil had authorised share capital of £2,000 with two shareholders and bank signatories who were also its directors. Mr Jackson and Mr Griffin held the entire issued share capital of £1 each. Baker Oil opened a US $ account at the same London bank branch on 17th December 1984 . Just a day later, a Mr Del Sorbo, an AGIP official had signed a payment order of US $518,802.92 in favour of Maersk Supply (Tunisia) Limited , payable at Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York. After the signature, the payment had been altered and made payable to 'Beker-Service Cie' with the address of the London branch of Lloyds Bank and the correct number of Baker Oil's dollar account. The altered payment order was executed by Banqu du Sud on 7th January 1985 . Jackson & Co. had already told Lloyds Bank to expect a payment and asked to be informed of its arrival. On 7th January Mr Del Sorbo also became aware of the fraud as he visited Banque du Sud. He asked the bank to stop the payments, but due to time differences between London , Tunis and New York , payments had already been made and could not be reversed.The sum of US$518,822.92 was credited to the account of Baker Oil and then transferred to the account of Jackson & Co, held at the same branch of Lloyds. Baker Oil's account was immediately closed. These transactions were confirmed in a letter to Baker Oil. On 9th January 1985, the same amount was transferred to Jackson & Co's 'Client's' account at the Isle of Man Bank Limited . On 15th January, most of the amount was paid out from this bank account to Kinz Joaillier SARL. Subsequently, Baker Oil, Euro-Arabian and Kinz were all put into liquidation. AGIP brought proceedings in Tunisia against Banqu du Sud and also sought to recover US$518,822.92 from Baker Oil (which no longer existed ) and Jackson & Co.During the court case, Jackson & Co. called no evidence, therefore, the court attached considerable importance to some documents presented to it. One of these related to the minutes (dated 22nd March 1984) of the first meeting of Keelward Limited , another of the payee companies . The minutes noted that 'the receipt of monies from Tunisia...formed part of a long-standing arrangement...the arrangements resulted in the extraction of monies from Tunisia in circumvention of the Tunisian Exchange Control Regulations.' In another document, a letter (dated 14 August 1984) addressed to Mr Jackson by a firm of solicitors noted that 'Agip may be able to establish a cause of action by claiming that the payments were obtained by fraud. Agip could also rely on English law as the fraud would presumably have taken place within England, at the time when monies were transferred out of Agip's account into the account of the UK companyalthough Agip may be able to establish a cause of action, it would still be necessary for Agip to establish fraud (as defined under English law) for any action for the recovery of the monies to be successfulBecause of the general principle of banking confidentiality, it would be extremely difficult for the Tunisian Government or Agip to obtain an order requiring Lloyds Bank to disclose banking transactions, unless disclosure is ordered by the English Courts '.On 19th May 1989 , Mr Justice Millett read out the judgment in the Chancery Division of the High Court, and concluded:'Mr Jackson and Mr Griffin knewof no connection or dealings between the Plaintiffs and Kinz or of any commercial reason for the Plaintiffs to make substantial payments to Kinz. They must have realised that the only function which the payee companies or Euro-Arabian performed was to act as "cut-outs" in order to conceal the true destination of the money from the Plaintiffsto make it impossible for investigators to make any connection between the Plaintiffs and Kinz without having recourse to Lloyds Bank's records; and their object in frequently replacing the payee company by another must have been to reduce the risk of discovery by the PlaintiffsMr Jackson and Mr Griffin are professional men. They obviously knew they were laundering moneyIt must have been obvious to them that their clients could not afford their activities to see the light of the day.' Judgment was accordingly given in favour of AGIP.'" |