The case of Piet Meyer
One of the most prominent cases regarding alleged police involvement in crime is that of the Senior Superintendent investigating organised crime in KwaZulu-Natal , Piet Meyer, who was appointed to this position in 1996 after heading the South African Narcotics Bureau in Durban .
The investigation into Meyer apparently started after the killing of a nightclub bouncer in February 1997. Statements taken from two men led police to a drug syndicate allegedly headed by a former policeman; they also cited major police corruption and named Meyer as one of the officers involved.93
Less than two months later, the Asset Forfeiture Unit, led by Willie Hofmeyr, arrived at Meyer's house to attach assets that he had allegedly obtained through illegal activities.
In court it was alleged that Meyer was regularly given large sums of money to protect illegal casino operators and prevent them being raided and that he had ordered the release of a cocaine dealer, a man charged with being in possession of an Uzi firearm, and a lawyer who had been found in possession of about R200,000-worth of fake R50 bank notes. Meyer was also accused of stealing confiscated pool tables, and stealing R10,000 in cash from the safe of the Commanding Officer of Sanab. In addition, Meyer was accused of corruption in arranging for a R10,000 donation to be made to the Police Officer's Club from the Gambling Association of South Africa in return for an affidavit supporting the continued operation of the then-illegal casino industry.
The court papers also described Meyer's relationship with deceased drug lord and notorious gangster, Sharif Khan, who died in 1995. Meyer allegedly arrested Khan in 1986 but was subsequently involved in Khan's irregular early release.
Meyer was suspended from the police service on full pay. He appeared in the Durban Regional Court in the same month on 16 criminal charges, including fraud, theft and defeating the ends of justice. He paid R10,000 bail and agreed to stiff bail conditions which included not interfering with the 39 witnesses listed on the charge sheet.94
At the end of July 1999, the same month Meyer's assets were seized, they were returned to him unconditionally. Meyer viewed this as vindication; however, the reasons for the return of his assets were based on a ruling that the provisions of the Act could not be applied retrospectively in regard to the seizure of assets.95
In September 1999, an additional charge of defeating the ends of justice was laid against Meyer, increasing the number of charges against him to 17. All 17 charges were dropped in March 2000 after the murder of the prosecution's star witness, Eric Tussie, a policeman. Tussie was shot five times in the back when trying to break up a fight outside a nightclub in Durban.96
By August 1999, 13 members of Durban 's Organised Crime Unit had resigned, been suspended, transferred to other units or booked off on 'stress leave'. A number of Meyer's colleagues were subsequently charged with fraud and theft.
In June 2000, Meyer was arrested for a second time, together with Sarel Geldenhuys and David McBrier, on corruption charges involving R2.4 million. The three are alleged to have taken money from owners of illegal casinos in return for protection from closure and prosecution. The money was received between January 1992 and February 2000.97
At an appearance in the Durban Magistrates Court on 30 July 2000 , Meyer was warned not to contact witnesses or to visit the offices of the Organised Crime Unit. A Senior Public Prosecutor said it appeared that Meyer had attempted to intimidate key witness in the former case against him. The Prosecutor alleged Meyer had also been to the Organised Crime Unit offices and used the Unit's computer to obtain confidential information on Andrew 'Spuiker' Ludick, former Durban Commander of the Unit.
A member of the Unit said in an interview:
I don't know how many of our guys had good relations with the big drug guys and with guys owning the prostitutes in Durban , but I can say that some were definitely taking money. How do you control that when the Unit is not answerable to anyone except its own Head and there are stories everywhere about himits all in court now for the whole world to see. 98
Speaking about the effect this situation had on the Unit, another member said:
What this has caused is a very real problem related to morale for those members of the unit who are not facing charges. Other police have the attitude that the Organised Crime Unit is organising crime rather than dealing with syndicates. This hurts the guys who are really straight. At the same time we know there are crooked guys among us and it is difficult to defend what they are doing.99
|